DESIGNING *for humans

Presenting at Human Factors Conference

I'll be participating in two sessions at the upcoming Human Factors & Ergonomics Society conference 

• Capturing Data During User Research  - I'm one of several panelist who'll be discussing methods and technologies for gathering and analyzing data in various user research contexts. Preview the focus of my presentation on Four Generations of Qualitative User Research Technology.
  
  
• Intuitive Voting: A Case Study in Rapid Research & Prototype Design - I'll  be presenting the research and design process for the HFES competition-winning concept, Intuitive Voting.

FieldCREW Concept on Windows Phone

In 2008 Bresslergroup presented FieldCREW - a concept tablet and software system empowering user researchers and designers conducting field research.  It included features for real-time video capture and tagging of observed activities, allowing a single researcher to have the observation capabilities of a team, and a team of observers to synchronize their observations as though they were a single researcher.  FieldCREW recevied widespread coverage on sites including SlashGear, the Awesomer, and Core77.

Fast forward five years, and to the Core77/Windows Phone App to the Future Design Challenge. Now we have reconceptualized FieldCREW as an app, providing the same core features as the original concept, in a more realizable and usable format (but, still a concept).

• 
• 
• 

The Bresslergroup app team, led by myself and interaction designer Matt Thomas, created the information architecture and visual design  for the app version based on the Windows Phone guidelines.  

Watch this the video for more information and screen examples for the Windows 8 phone concept version of FieldCREW:

  

 

Measuring Your User Experience Design (video)

Last month I collaborated with Charles Mauro on a presentation of leading user experience research methods as part of the New York Technology Council's series on User Experience Design.

We presented an overview of research methods in terms of -  the business problems they address, the data generated, relative costs, statistical validity, etc.  I discussed qualitative methods focused on product design including ethnographic research, remote ethnography and observational ergonomics; Mauro covered quantitative web research methods including large-sample online behavior testing and eye tracking.  We provided professional tips on how to be more efficient and what to look out for in terms of efficiency and data quality.

After the intro, my section starts around 11:30 and Mauro resumes with his review of methods aorund 42:00.

You can also access a subset of my slides via SlideShare.

Physical Gestures to Document Design Research

As the number and variety of gestural interface applications has exploded, design researchers have been focusing more on the physical aspects of human-artifact interaction. The potential benefits of gestural interfaces - simplicity, ease of learning, memorability - are valuable to end-users, but also provide an emerging opportunity and challenges for the researchers who study them (see Dan Saffer's presentation on researching interactive gestures).

Typically design research documentation is a cumbersome process of rapid note-taking and rigorous reviews of video recordings.  Over the years I have identified and discussed tools and technologies that can improve the efficiency of design research data collection.  And I see the next wave of user research tools not only focusing on physical interaction, but actually enabling the design researchers to document behavioral observations through their own physical interactions.

Case in point - at Bresslergroup we have been trialling the Nintendo Wiimote controller (pictured above) in conjunction with Techsmith's Morae software as a wireless data tagging system.  Wireless data tagging is an activity that allows one or more researchers to mark key observations, synchronized in real-time.  In fact, wireless tagging was a key element of our FieldCREW concept research tablet (concept tagging device pictured below).

As part of our proof-of-concept for FieldCREW, we have configured the various buttons and controllers on the Wiimote to correspond to task-specific behaviors.  For example, the directional controller can correspond to the direction of an observed person's physical motions, while the other buttons can be mapped to specific tasks or activities.  As a result, a skilled "tagger" can unobtrusively document events in real-time with a single-hand and without interrupting their line of sight to the activity (versus having to look down to write notes).  All of the tagged events become markers corresponding to a synchronized video-recording in Morae.

This is more than a gain of efficiency or convenience.  It is an enhanced means to observe and record physical behaviors, as it changes the role of the observer from a somewhat passive information gatherer to an active, real-time participant, even giving game-like qualities to the research tasks (e.g. when the user moves left, I push left).

I'll be discussing and demonstrating this, as well as other methods for physically documenting physical behaviors at the upcoming Design Research Conference. 

May the (Tactile) Force Be With You

 
Here at Bresslergroup we have recently started using a force-sensing "glove" for ergonomic research and analysis.  We use the FingerTPS ("tactile pressure sensing") system from Pressure Profile Systems.   Both the hardware and software are very easy to set-up and use; and we've been applying it to a range of projects including consumer, industrial and medical product design. 

For example, we can measure the force applied over time for particular fingers when operating various controls on products (e.g. touchscreen versus five-way controller).  Besides benchmarking product controls, we can evaluate the relative strengths of different types of users (e.g. children, adults, disabled users) to advise on appropriate control design.

See the video below from PPS that explains how the system works:

Livescribe for Qualitative Research

I was interviewed in the Summer 2009 issue of QRCA Views, a magazine for qualitative researchers, on the topic of the Livescribe Pulse Smartpen.  Readers of this blog know that I've been using the Pulse since its launch, and the article, by Katherine Weagant, provides an introduction to the tool and its capabilities to new users.  See page 54 of the online version to read the article.

2009 ID Magazine Annual Review

Call me psychic if you wish, but three consumer products that I discussed as valuable user research tools have won awards in the 2009 I.D. Magazine Annual Review:

• The Fitbit Tracker, which I discussed as a system for measuring physical behavior and movement.  This device has been getting a lot of press lately, so maybe that means it will be launched shortly.  When I first discussed the Fitbit last September it was scheduled for a Jan '09 launch.  The web site now says "early spring", so don't hold your breath.  I placed an order months ago and have not heard a thing...very similar to what happened with the LiveScribe Pen.

• And speaking of the LiveScribe Pulse Smartpen(as it's properly named), it was given recognition by the I.D. jurors despite the observations that "it could have been more beautifully integrated" and "It's not pretty, but it works very well."  Hmmm...isn't this a design review?  From personal experience, it does work very well, but it has fatal design and usability flaws, including an uncanny tendency to roll off the table.

• Lastly, I covered the Flip Mino digital video recorder as one of several examples of effective, simple design in my article keep it simple, stupid.

Clearly a coincidence as I had no involvement with the Annual Review this year - although after serving as a juror last year I wrote some practical suggestions for future submitters.

FieldCREW an IDEA Finalist

While the FieldCREW design research concept did not win an IDEA award this year, it was selected as a 2009 Finalist in the Computer Equipment Concept category.  I'll highlight the award winners in the Research category when they are announced in July.  In the meantime, here's my discussion of last year's IDEA winners in the Research category.

Asterisks *User Research Technology Edition

Here's a quick rundown of some recent news & tools related to user research technologies:

• MIT Technology Review summarizes some emerging technologies from CHI 2009, including eye-tracking goggles (pictured above).    
• CNET has a comparative review of the top 5 iPod voice recording accessories.   
• GuapoVideo, an online video editing/sharing tool was first introduced at the IDSA Connecting conference in San Francisco, has been released.  
• Elizabeth Bacon has posted a Google spreadsheet of online/remote testing software tools.  This is a work-in-progress, but already includes 17 different tools.

Asterisks *9 March 2009

• For researchers who need to organize and arrange video footage, LifeHacker reviews the Six Best Video Editing Applications for Mac and Windows.  They range from the professional platform, Avid ($2500) to Windows Movie Maker (basically free).
  
• Core77 summarizes the Greener Gadgets Conference Design Competition winners.  The top contenders tended to focus on influencing behavior through action or motivation as mechanisms to reduce energy usage.
  
• And a reminder about the upcoming IDSA District Conferences, which start up in a couple of weeks, beginning in Boston (above).

Checklists as a Design Tool

The humble checklist has been receiving a good deal of attention in recent years, particularly in the context of medical error avoidance.  For example, earlier this year the New England Journal of Medicine published A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population.  The international study reported a nearly 50% decline in patient deaths when a combined written/verbal checklist was used in conjunction with surgical procedures.  The authors diligently point out several possible sources of error that may have contributed to the results, including the Hawthorne effect, a "short-term improvement caused by observing worker performance." 

But rather than seeing the Hawthorne effect as a source of error, I see it as a source of performance.  That is, the checklist process serves as a continuing form of performance observation - by having to refer to an external reference, the surgical teams were consistently self-aware and performed better as a consequence.

Self-awareness is an important issue in successful design as well.  A major challenge in user research is communicating recommendations or guidelines to a design and/or engineering team, with the goal of affecting the team's behavior towards a desired design outcome.  Design guidelines are typically communicated in a number of ways - reports, presentations, working sessions, collaborative discussions, etc. - but the checklist format might be an even more effective communication tool.  This is because of both the way checklists are created, and how they are used.

The checklist format requires that information is presented in specific, succinct and actionable terms.  For example detailing the size of touch points, the labeling of a control, or the diameter of a handle.  This forces the checklist creator (i.e. the researcher) to come to specific recommendations.  Those items that cannot be boiled down to a single point should be further discussed or researched until they can be, and if not, considered for removal.

For the checklist reader, the benefits of a structured list over a more vague presentation or lengthy report should be clear.  But its also important to keep in mind the verbal component of checklist usage in the medical study.  The check-and-balance approach of having open communication is probably as important, if not more, than the checklist itself. 

Comparing the benefits of a checklist in the highly structured, rigorous surgical domain with the creative, diverse world of design may be a stretch, but I expect that the value of clear communication is consistent across all human endeavors.

FieldCREW Concept 2.0

We've made some design revisions since I presented the FieldCREW concept - a system for gathering observational data - at the Design Research Conference last September. 

Download FieldCREW_Storyboard (PDF) for an updated overview of the concept design approach, including descriptions of the remote data collecting components and early research & sketches.

"Reading Your Mind" Video on 60 Minutes

60 Minutes must have a thing for neuro-research.  Following on from their November story on Brain-Computer Interfaces, the news magazine has just run a piece on the application of functional MRIs for "thought identification" research.

It's a balanced, if shallow piece, but I was irritated by reporter Lesley Stahl's folkish reluctance to accept that thought is physically based.  Fortunately, she was kept in check by a rational thinking neuroscientist, Marcel Just:

"It's breathtaking," Stahl said. "And kind of eerie."

"Well, you know, I think the reason people have that reaction is because it reveals the essence of what it means to be a person. All of those kinds of things that define us as human beings are brain patterns," Just replied.

"We don't wanna know that… it all boils down to, I don't know, molecules and things like that," Stahl said.

"But we are, you know, we are biological creatures. You know, our limbs we accept are, you know, muscles and bone. And our brain is a biological thinking machine," he replied.

Top Posts of 2008: DfH Year in Review

With just a few weeks left in the year (and even less productive blogging time), I thought I would put together this brief "best of 2008" on Designing for Humans.  If you're new to the blog, this is a good way to catch-up on some of the highlights you may have missed over the past year:

• User Research Technology - Always a core theme on DfH, this year I took a hands-on look at applying many emerging tools to support design research.  This included the Livescribe Pulse Pen, Casio's High Speed Camera and the IDEA award winning Size China anthropometric data set.  Looking to the future, I unveiled the FieldCREW workstation concept (pictured), and discussed the state of user research technology at the Design Research Conference.  Still waiting on the FitBit tracking device (hopefully in the approaching weeks).
• Reading - I recommend the best book on user research, a forthcoming book on product design, design research-related articles in the Harvard Business Review, human factors in mechanical engineering and an international standard on product usability that's not worth the money. 
• Awards - I blogged on the unique experience of judging both the IDEA awards and the ID Magazine Annual Design Review in the same year.  Also, read about the IDEA award winners in the research category.
• Ergonomics- I put together the FoRCePS guidelines for observing ergonomic problems during contextual observation.

...okay, my link pen ran out.

Interactive Video Object Manipulation

Interactive Video Object Manipulation from Dan Goldman on Vimeo.

Back from Thanksgiving break and excited to share an interesting video tool demo.  Easier to see than explain, these not-yet-available functions allow what I would describe as direct video manipulation. 

For design research and human factors analysis, relevant capabilities include annotating objects and people and tracking motion.  These features are surprisingly similar to some of the user interface tools in the FieldCREW research workstation concept.

Thanks to the IXDA discussion board for the tip.

Design Research Conference Videos Online

     

An initial set of speaker videos from this past September's Design Research Conference are now available.  This includes:

• Luis Arnal - Field Stories from Latin America: Considerations for Design Researchers
• Colleen Murray - Setting Research Targets: Using a Scenario Planning Process to Envision How the World Might Change
• Liz Sanders - Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design
• Rob Tannen - High-Definition User Research
• Miguel Gomez Winebrenner - Maximizing Design and Innovation by Keeping a Pulse on Multicultural Audiences

Here's a write-up of my experience as a conference attendee.

DEFHUM - Research Tech Bullets

A brief round-up of several recent technology-related items:

• Jess McMullin's posting, 10 Cameras for Design Research is a thoughtful set of recommendations for selecting specific cameras for field research.  McMullin focuses on still camera with attention to practical issues such as light sensitivity and multi-functionality: "a camera that can do double duty and shoot video significantly expands your options for data collection by just adding a few extra memory cards. Keep in mind that video takes a lot of time to analyze. A lot. Hours of video can mean days of analysis."
  
• And speaking of cameras, I came across the Spy Pass Card Micro Camera.  Don't know what to expect in terms of image quality, but it would definitely come in handy for walking trade shows.
  
• Earlier this year I mentioned the forthcoming Fitbit as a potential tool for tracking human motion for research purposes.  Now there's SNIF Tag, a canine equivalent (pictured).  Then again, there's no reason why you couldn't wear the SNIF while your canine sports the Fitbit.

Managing Field Research Photos

One of the most time-consuming tasks in field research is organizing and editing photos to get from the raw set of images into a presentable, consistent format.  This is typically done via a tedious, repetitive process of selecting the desired photo files, cropping down to desired proportion and dimensions, compressing to reduce file size, etc.

Fortunately there are a number of batch image processing programs available for the PC and Mac that can automate these types of processes and do more.  A couple of weeks ago Smashing Magazine ran an article, 15 Useful Batch Image Processors, that covers a range of these tools (many of them free):

"With batch image processing, you can specify a size or file type, and then a script runs to convert the images. You can process hundreds or thousands of images with just a few clicks. And nearly every image processor comes with a unique feature set."

Definitely a useful tool set to look into for those who follow the mantra, work smarter, not harder.

Size China Headforms & Data Now Available

I've been talking about SizeChina ever since I heard Roger Ball present at the 2007 IDSA conference.  Subsequently, his effort to create reference anthropometric data of Chinese heads and faces for product designers has won an  IDEA Gold award for research. The project made valuable discoveries regarding key differences between Asian and Caucasian head sizes and ratios, that have not been consistently accommodated in the design of eyewear, protective headgear, medical/dental products, etc.

Finally, the products from the SizeChina project are commercially available from Certiform.  These include a set of 10 representative solid headforms (pictured).  You can purchase the set for $20k or a single on for $2500.

The detailed data sets (3D scan files and measurements) are also available at various prices/package levels, ranging from a 12-person "light version" for $399 up to almost $15k for the complete data set of over 1500 scans.

Certiform has provided a sample file set in Excel format to give you a sense of the level of detail included: Download Landmarks_data_sample.  See the diagram below to interpret the data set, especially if you can't tell your tragion from your zygofrontale.

Fitbit - Tracking Physical Behavior

So here's my take on the "next big thing" in the little world of user research for product design.  Measurement of physical activity is typically tedious (e.g. time and motion studies), highly expensive, or inaccurate (participant self-reporting).  Despite these limitations, it has the potential to be very valuable in quantifying user behavior, such as level of exertion, or rest/motion periodicity in shifts.  For example, the ROI for a new system or product may depend on measuring before and after differences in user physical effort or movement.

I recently learned of the soon-to-be launched Fitbit, what one of my colleagues described as a "pedometer on steriods".  And it is marketed towards the health/fitness marktet.  But what makes its particularly useful to user research are its accuracy, battery life (claimed at 10+ days) and reporting features.  According to the Fitbit web site:

"The Fitbit Tracker contains a motion sensor like the ones found in the Nintendo Wii. The Tracker senses your motion in three dimensions and converts this into useful information about your daily activities. The Tracker measures the intensity and duration of your physical activities, calories burned, steps taken, distance traveled, how long it took you to fall asleep, the number of times you woke up throughout the night and how long you were actually asleep vs just lying in bed. You can wear the Tracker loosely in your pocket or clipped to your clothing, even bras."

Here's a screenshot of the tracking web interface...

 

 

Launch date is "late Dec- early Jan". Well if they're anything like LiveScribe, maybe March or June, but I'd love to be surprised

Casio Launches Lower-Cost High Speed Camera (EX-FH20)

Applying high-speed imagery to study user performance has been a topic that I have written about and presented on in recent weeks.  Earlier this year I purchased the Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1, and now Casio has announced a comparable, lower-cost mode, the
EX-FH20.

The EX-FH20 does not have "Pro" in its name, and does not reach the speeds of the EX-F1, but for studying human behavior, the newer model is probably more than adequate, and in fact excels over the EX-F1 in certain characteristics (e.g. higher resolution for stills, but not video, greater zoom, slightly more compact body).  Most importantly, it has an estimated list price ($599) that is $400 less than the Pro model ($999).  In either case, they are very similar, versatile cameras (still, HD video, high-speed video) that offer capabilities unavailable in any other cameras near their price range.

Here's a breakdown of some key performance difference between the two models - for more info, go to the Casio Web site:

The High Speed EXILIM EX-FH20

• 40 Frames Per Second Burst Mode
• High-Speed Movie Recording up to 1000 Frames Per Second
• 20x Optical Zoom
• High-Definition Movies 720p (1280 x 720 pixels)
  

The EXILIM Pro EX-F1

• 60 Frames Per Second Burst Mode
• High-Speed Movie Recording up to 1,200 Frames Per Second
• 12x Optical Zoom
• Full High-Definition Movies (1080i)

On a feature basis, I can't say I have buyer's remorse, although the price difference is pretty significant - but the early adopter really can't complain about price.

 

FieldCREW - A User Research Technology Concept

At this past weekend's Design Research Conference(DRC2008), I presented on the topic of user research technologies -  what's currently in use and some of the newer tools that can be applied to research (if you read this blog with any regularity then you know what I'm talking about). 

One of the key points I discussed is the lack of tools that are specifically and intentionally designed around the needs of user researchers with respect to data gathering, analysis and communication of findings.  To address that need, I've been working with the design team at Bresslergroup on creating a concept user research technology platform.  While still under creative development, I took the opportunity of the DRC to present our work in progress.

The field-based contextual research workstation, or FieldCREW, is primarily targeted at improving data collection efficiency, particularly when studying complex, multi-dimensional work situations such as surgery in an operating room or a construction crew.

FieldCREW brings together a number of "near-future" technologies to support user research in two contexts:

• When a researcher is working by him/herself and needs to play the role of both note-taker and videographer

• When a team of observers is working together and needs a way to synchronize their observations around multiple events

The Workstation consists of the tablet and several wireless data gathering components (see illustrations in the slideshow below).  The components include:

• Wireless, remotely controlled tracking video cameras for audio and video recording
• Handheld wireless taggers that allow each observer to tag key events of their choosing for later review - tagging is synched to a common timeline on the tablet
• Subvocalization sensor allows the researcher to silently dictate notes that are automatically transcribed to text and stored on the tablet

The tablet manages and receives data from these wireless components and provides features including:

• Video notation (i.e. telestrator) for annotation of events as they happen
• Speech-to-text translation of recorded audio (and subvocalizations)
• Access to stored and online project and research reference materials
• Built-in storage and recharging for wireless components
• Synchronization of all input sources (video, tagging, notes) for streamlined analysis

In a research scenario the lead researcher (or an associate) can manage the data from multiple observers and utilize tagging and annotation features to prioritize key observations, speeding up the analysis process.  Similarly, a single researcher, working alone, can do the work of a team by coordinating input from multiple sources.

And while FieldCREW has the capabilities to support complex field research situations, it can also be used by a single researcher conducted a one-on-one interview, much like a clipboard is used.

We'd appreciate your questions, comments and suggestions as we continue to develop this new platform for facilitating user research.

Morae 3 Launches

Techsmith has launched the new version of Morae  usability testing software. 

This version goes beyond the screen-based limitations of the preceding versions, by allowing research facilitator's to connect a digital video camera (versus just a web cam) and use two cameras simultaneously.  This allows, for example, for video capture of the a research participant's face with one camera at the same time the user's hands-on interactions with a product or concept are recorded with the second camera. 

Like previous versions, Morae 3 provides basic video editing and production features.  A very convenient tool if you don't need high-resolution output.

I wrote a preview article  after seeing a beta version demonstrated a few months ago, which covers some of the basic features, pros and cons..

Photosynth: 3D Visualization of Digital Photos

Microsoft Live Labs has launched a public version of Photosynth, a Web tool that uses the overlapping information in a set of still photos taken in a space to create a 3D mapping between the images. I put together a quick collage of the product "museum" space in my office - the more pictures you take from different positions, the better. When viewing, use "f" for full screen and "ctrl" to toggle to the data points.

Potential applications to user research include modeling observed work environments when videotaping is not allowed or impractical.  There's also the possibility of using Photosynth to create 3D views of products or concepts, although it's better suited for large spaces than close ups.  But for one example, see this joystick and note how you can move around it from all sides.

Like IBM's Many Eyes for text and data visualization, all Photosynths currently created are publicly viewable.  Understandably the site has a high traffic load so prepare to be patient.

Alternative Digital Pens

While I've given a lot of recent attention to the Livescribe Pulse pen (in fact using it for recording during a usability test this week), I wanted to bring attention to a couple of other options.  But comparing Iogear's Mobile Digital Scribeor Dane-Elec's ZPen to the Pulse isn't really apples to apples.  While all three devices can digitally record your handwriting, only the Pulse synchs your notes with recorded audio.  This critical feature makes it extremely valuable for documenting and reviewing information.  On the other hand, the Pulse requires the use of special paper for tracking purposes.  So if you're just looking for a way to digitize and translate your handwriting to text, (albeit, poorly) these pens may be useful to you.

The New York Times' David Pogue has a written review (plus requisite cheesy video)  for the Mobile Digital Scribe and ZPen that can give you more information since I haven't had first-hand experience with either of those two devices.

Initial Results from User Research Tech Survey

Thanks to everyone (n=69) who participated in piloting and responding to this year's survey on technologies for user research, which is now closed.  You can now access the summary data.  This is a roll-up of the quantiatitve questions, but does not include open-ended responses.

I'll presnt a more substantative analysis during the Design Research Conference (September) and will post that presentation here following the conference.

User Research Technology Survey

Designing for Humans is conducting a survey on issues related to technology use for user research.  You can access the survey here http://tinyurl.com/3nen7e

The survey follows-up from the 2006 efforts to study user research technology, which also included a survey. 

Your input to the current survey is appreciated and results will be posted on this site, as well as discussed at the upcoming Design Research conference.

Morae 3 Preview - Product Usability Testing Capabilities

Last week I attended a demo of the beta version of Techsmith's Morae 3 (hosted by PhillyCHI & UPA Delaware Valley) .  The latest version of the usability software product is expected to be launched  late summer/early fall this year.  Based on the demo, it looks like it's close to being operational, but there are still bugs to work out.

For those unfamiliar, Morae is a software-based usability testing tool that was launched in 2004.  It replaces traditional usability labs that relied on hardware video cameras, scan converters and video tape with web cams, screen capture software and basic digital video editing/presentation capabilities.  Morae 2 provided some improvements and feature enhancements.

While Morae/Morae 2 is excellent for software/web usability testing, it has limited applicability to 3D product testing.  While you could test on-screen simulations of products (especially interfaces) and capture off-screen action via a the web cam, off-screen video capture is not its strong suit.  For one notable, exception, I used the original version of Morae to conduct ride-along usability testing of an in-car GPS.

Morae 3 is a step in the direction of supporting product research.  Shane Lovellette's presentation highlighted features including:

• Support for simultaneous recording of up to two external digital video and/or web cameras - for example, one recording the user's face, the other focused on the hands.
• Ability to capture from multipe monitors simultaneously - for example to study a multi-screen financial workstation.
• Automatic task delivery to guide a user through a series of tasks without a moderator

The use of dual external video cameras will be most benefical for product research.  Video is saved in Morae at up to 720x440 resolution, fine for most situations, but not where detailed imagery is required.

On the anaysis and editing side, Morae 3 allows the facilitator to add comments and notations during the recording and review video at up to 4x speed.  It also has built-in integration with PowerPoint and Word for efficient output generation.

While the demo focused on mobile phone/pda usability testing, it may be useful for a wide range of product testing situations, as well as for field research where movement/portability is not a factor (e.g. observing from a stationery position), as your cameras will be tied to the laptop during recording.

First Impressions of Livescribe Pulse Pen (finally!)

I've been suggesting the potential benefits of the Livescribe pulse pen to user researchers for months now, and now I finally have one (well, two actually).  After a few of days of use, I am positively impressed by the product, but it does have a significant design flaw.

On the positive side, the pen's ability to synchronize recorded audio with your handwriting and then review via "paper replay" works very well.  The unique user interface takes a bit of getting used to, but is relatively simple.  Since the pen only has a single button for power on/off, all interface commands are done through tapping on various symbols pre-printed on the notebook paper.  For example, to navigate the menu structure you use the pen to tap on the four points of a cross-hair printed at the bottom of Livescribe's notebook (see image below). 

The four points of the cross hair are equivalent to up, down previous and next.  But you can also simply draw your own cross-hair if you need to access the navigation  - this user-generated user interface capability is quite clever and worth considering in other product experiences.

The audio quality was as good as expected.  With the recording quality set on high, I was able to follow a small conference room conversation playback relatively clearly, even though I had been sitting next to a digital projector.  Although I would probably use headphones during playback for greater acuity.  The recording function has settings for different size recording environments, but I haven't tinkered with those yet.

From a physical perspective, the pen is as large as a fountain pen, but light and comfortable for my larger than average hand size.  I used the pen in a recent client meeting and no one seemed to notice - or at least I didn't see anyone staring at the pen or asking about it. 

But it was during this meeting that I realized a major problem with the pen design.  If you put it down, it tends to roll.  There's no clip or any other protrusion to prevent the cylindrical pen from drifting off the notebook, to the table, and possibly the floor.  I tried various orientations to minimize the chance of rolling - perpendicular versus parallel to the notebook, but that didn't seem to matter much.  What I did find was that the natural resting place of the pen is with the micrphones face down.  This means that putting the pen down impairs the audio quality (not to mention that a rolling pen is noisy). 

This lack of a clip is counter to one of the primary benefits of the pen - the ability to record when you're not writing.  A clip would provide a roll-stop, and also allow the researcher to more easily attach it to his or her clothing, backpack, etc. while participating hands free.  I'm planning to create my own solution to this design gap.

One other point - the provided desktop software provides little in the way of useful functionality beyond storing and transferring the writing/audio recordings.  But there are expectations of third-party software development that will exploit the pen's capabilities.

All of that said, the Livescribe Pulse definitiely delivers on its claims, with functional, easy to use software and recording capabilities.  I just wish they had considered hands-free operation.  Also, if you can stomach David Pogue's cheesiness, here's a video review from last Friday's New York Times.

Technology Behind Livescribe Pulse

 
While I'm still waiting to receive my "pre-order" Livescribe pen, MIT Technology Review has a technical breakdownof the pen's hardware, as well as a video demo.

And here's some free space below to practice your penmanship...

Data Visualization of Qualitative User Research

While it is extremely important to gather qualitative data such as user interviews, it can be difficult to make sense of such ‘unstructured information’.   Often the biggest challenge is knowing just where to start.  For example consider trying to make sense of the transcriptions from several dozen user interviews - you might have a mix of positive and negative feedback, anecdotes, opinions and narratives.  You could painstakingly sift through all of the conversations, highlighting meaningful terms or search for keywords.  

But data visualization tools, typically thought of in terms of quantitative data, can also help to understand qualitative information.  Data visualization has been promoted as an effective means to present data, but its enormous value in analyzing data has been largely overlooked. 

One such example is IBM’s Many Eyes.  While this web application set is known to many for its beautiful graphing capabilities, I find the text visualization tools most valuable for analyzing qualitative data.  In particular, the Word Tree in Many Eyes “lets you pick a word or phrase and shows you all the different contexts in which it appears. The contexts are arranged in a tree-like branching structure to reveal recurrent themes and phrases.”

When applied to qualitative data (e.g. interview transcripts, free-text survey comments), the Word Tree allows a researcher to quickly scan through text-based content by searching via keyword or phrase.  For example to see what a group of users said about a particular product feature, the researcher can create a word tree around the feature (e.g. “portable” or “installation”) or around particular terms that are likely to indicate problems (e.g. “difficult to”, “but”).  

Visualizing the interviews around critical terms provides a starting point for reviewing and understanding qualitative data in an efficient manner.  It is not a substitute for thoughtful analysis, but a head-start. 

Note: One significant caveat in the case of Many Eyes is that all submitted data is publicly viewable, so it’s not always suitable for proprietary data analysis – but it is free.

NY Times Review of Casio High Speed Digital Camera

Following up from my preliminary posting on the Casio Exilim Pro Ex-F1 high speed digital camera.  Last week, New York Times technology writer David Pogue, wrote a detailed review of the unique camera, including pointing out some limitations and constraints (e.g. light sensitivity, focus speed).  But Pogue is clearly impressed, suggesting that "it does seem ungrateful to criticize such an astonishing camera; it’s like complaining that your 7-year-old violin virtuoso is lousy at sports."

Pogue's article indicates that the camera will be available by mid-April.  I impatiently ordered one from Japan, where it was released at the end of March.  I should have in hand in a few days, so stay tuned...

An Introduction to Neuroergonomics

In my recent article on emerging trends in design research, I intentionally left off the field of neuroergonomics.  While it is a growing field, I don't see it becoming commercially viable for several more years.  Moreover, it is a fascinating area  deserving of it's own posting (or several). 

To begin with, the term neuroergonomics represents the merge or overlap of neuroscience and ergonomics/human factors .  In other words, how a better understanding of brain functions can improve human factors methods and tools.

A primary research area within neuroergonomics is the application of neuroscience-based technology to the study of ergonomics.  Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work, published in 2007, is a surprisingly accessible and readable collection of chapters covering these technologies, which include relatively familiar ones such as EEG and MRI, and others from the medical field.   While such technologies are robust, they can be impractical for real-world applications.

Other methods, while less precise, may have promise for measuring brain activity in less obtrusive ways.  For example, transcranial doppler sonography (TCDS - think weather radar for your head), uses localized sensors to measure cerebral blood flood as a potential correlate of workload or stress.  For example, higher bloodflow in certain parts of the brain may indicate that the user is working harder to complete a task.  Imagine having such a TCDS sensor embedded in a car or cockpit to evaluate if a driver was mentally overloaded and required assistance.  For more information on TCDS, see a video of the work being done at the University of Cincinnati (from the dept where I did my grad work, incidentally). 

Much of the work in neuroergonomics is at the level of basic research - determining the validity, reliability and practicality of applying such technologies to real world problems.  Consequently, the focus tends to be on high-level human factors variables such as attention, workload and stress.  Applications to more "everyday" product design problems are further down the road, but probably not as far as you might expect.

Of course, I've barely scratched the surface of the field of neuroergonomics.  For more information, I highly recommend the previously mentioned book.  You can also check out Raja Parasuraman's work - he is one of the leading researchers in this domain - including this introductory overview.

High-Speed Photography and Video for Ergonomics

High-speed video and photography is getting a lot of attention these days.  This month's Wired Magazine  summarized the history of high-speed photography, from the work of Harold Edgerton to the recent use of lasers to capture images with shutter speeds of 300 x 10^-15 seconds!
(also see last year's article on The Ultimate High-Speed Photography Kit).

And just last week, Vision Research, makers of commercial-grade high-speed cameras, announced the Phantom V12 (inset photo), capable of recording one million pictures per second.

But from a practical point of view, the most intriguing news is the Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1. Due in March for an estimated $1000, this camera brings high-speed photography and video to the digital prosumer market.  Several unique features include:

• Ultra High Speed Burst Mode: Up to 60 shots at can be taken at once, so 60 shots per second for one second, or 5 shots per second for 12 seconds, are possible.
• High Speed digital movie recording of up to 1200 frames per second (fps)
• Full High Definition recording at standard speed

In addition to these impressive capabilities, the camera offers some novel user interaction feature such as a buffer to pre-record images prior to the shutter depression, allowing room for error when trying to capture a quick event; and Slow Motion View to review real-time events in slow-motion on the cameras LCD via a buffer.  And of course...stereo recording : )  All of these features are exciting from a gizmo geek's perspective - and there are plenty of reviews and videos from CES. 

But there's a tremendous opportunity to apply this technology to product design.  Specifically, I will be using the high speed burst mode and high speed digital movies to capture motion during rapid manual tasks  - such as the use of a construction tool, surgical instrument or mobile device keypad.  Extending visual perception to micro-seconds is likely to reveal interesting sub-patterns of movement and orientation that are overlooked or invisible at a standard time-scale.  Moreover, it introduces a new perspective on observing physical behavior that expands user research capabilities - at least as far as the presumably massive file storage and power needs of this unique camera will take you.

Update on LiveScribe Pulse Smartpen - 3D Sound Recording

Some bad news/good news regarding the forthcoming LiveScribe Smartpen that I had discussed in December.  The bad news is that the pen will not be available in January as had originally been communicated, but now in March - although pre-orders are supposed to happen prior to then ($199 for 2GB model).

On the good news side, LiveScribe has released more detail about the Smartpen including technical specs, features and videos.  The most newsworthy feature announced is the stereo recording capability which can be done via dual microphones built-in to the pen, or via earphone-based microphones.  In the past I have talked about the value of stereo recording in user research.  But microphones worn on the ears take this a step further, by allowing binaural recording, which is actually more veridical then conventional stereo.  In other words, recordings made with microphones positioned on the ears will sound much more realistic in terms of sound space, relative loudness, etc., compared to two stereo microphones on the recording device itself - sort of the auditory equivalent of visual 3D.  This definitely takes the pen further past the tipping point for me in terms of desirability.

CES and Bug Labs

 

While I was not able to attend the Consumer Electronics Show this year due to other work commitments, all reports indicate that it was bigger than ever.  As expected, a number of high performance, high definition videocameras were announced, featuring researcher-friendly capabilities including larger capacity hard drives, image stabilization and greater optical zoom ranges.  I'm somewhat partial to the new JVC Everio line from a styling point of view, especially the top of the line GZ-HD7.

But beyond the typical consumer product lines, one product stood out and even took the Best of CES award for the emerging technology category.  That product is Bug Lab's Bug, described as a:

"collection of easy-to-use electronic modules that snap together to build any gadget you can imagine. Each BUGmodule represents a specific gadget function (ex: a camera, a keyboard, a video output, etc). You decide which functions to include and BUG takes care of the rest letting you try out different combinations quickly and easily. With BUG and the integrated programming environment/web community (BUGnet), anyone can build, program and share innovative devices and applications. We don't define the final products - you do."

In other words, a set of modular consumer electronics components that can fit together and then be custom programmed to do whatever the user/developer desires - open source will help with that a lot. 

The current set of modules include an LCD display, a camera, GPS and motion detector - all to be released this quarter, with second quarter modules including a touch screen, keyboard, and audio module.  Check out some videos on YouTube.

These components represent a promising set of opportunities for user and design research:

• Create custom data gathering devices and programs to conduct observational research (camera), time and motion studies (motion sensor, GPS), etc.
• Develop custom products and user interface prototypes for testing using the hardware and software capabilities

The quality of the hardware (e.g. video image quality, motion detector sensitivity) and the ease and flexibility of the development environment will be key of course, but I look forward to the possibilities that BUG may enable for the creative designer/researcher.

LiveScribe - Paradigm Shifting User Research Technology?

I don't believe in "mission statements", but if Designing for Humans had one, it might be "to realize the application of emerging technologies in support of design research".  While I discuss various technologies, many are specialized or several years away from general applicability.  But I recently learned of the LiveScribe smartpen, and I can honestly say this is a technology that can have a valuable, near term impact for virtually all researchers.

The device is an electronic pen set to launch in the first quarter of 2008.  It has several features, but the one that stands out is called Paper Replay.  This feature:

"allows total recall... by simply tapping on your notes. When used to take notes during a discussion or lecture, the smartpen records the conversation and digitizes the handwriting, automatically synchronizing the ink and audio. By later tapping the ink, the user can replay the conversation from the exact moment the note was written. Notes and audio can also be uploaded to a PC where they can be replayed, saved, searched or sent."

In other words, the pen records audio in synch with your writing ,and indexes the audio with your writing.  As a result, subsequently tapping on a particular written note will play back the audio segment corresponding to the time when the note was written.  Still not clear? - then watch the comic-book style demo.

So what does this mean for design research?  Well, note-taking is a challenging skill, and typically we rely on a combination of hastily written notes and audio (or audio-video)recordings to document research.  The LiveScribe brings these two approaches together in an integrated way, potentially reducing equipment and streamlining workflow.

While the LiveScribe was not designed for user research applications, consider how it might be applied:

• During user interviews, the researcher can reference what he or she writes or sketches directly back to the interviewees words for clarity and idea expansion.
• In usability testing the facilitator can reference recorded comments directly back to a discussion guide document to quickly drill-down to supporting quotes.
• For ethnographic observations informant conversations and environmental sounds can be unobtrusively recorded while taking notes. 

The potential paradigm shift is moving from using handwritten notes and recordings as separate, complimentary tools to truly integrated ones.  Well, perhaps not paradigm shifting, but damn convenient.

Reality Check: I should caveat that I have not used this product yet directly and am basing my assumptions on what I have read, but expect a full review as soon as it becomes available.   Also the pen requires special gridded paper, for tracking purposes.  I also wouldn't expect the audio quality recorded on the pen to be of high caliber, which is pretty important.

With that all said, I wouldn't be surprised if the LiveScribe (or a similar product), become a part of the user researcher's tool belt, along with the camcorder, notepad, and granola bar.

Eight Design Research Themes for 2008: Technologies and Methodologies

2007 has witnessed the continued maturity of user research practices in product design/development organizations. As this continues, we look to 2008 and key areas of growth and change in user research technologies and methodologies. What many of these themes have in common reflects a shift from how to conduct research, to how to manage all of the research findings and results – clearly a positive trend and a nice problem to have.   Stay tuned into 2008 as these themes are tracked in further detail.

Technologies

Even a casual reader of this web log will have observed the ever-growing options in data gathering technologies available for a variety of research applications. For 2008, the themes in technology are diverse – from high definition video to a new resource of anthropometric head measurements of the Chinese population. But the more compelling tools address needs in organizing and analyzing qualitative data:

1. High Definition (HD) Video- HD video cameras are rising in popularity while falling in price. Higher resolution video means larger file sizes and typically more time for video editing and file management. On the other hand, greater visual clarity can be extremely valuable for studying fine motor control tasks, small control/interface element usage and visually-rich environments. Surgical observation and consumer electronics usability are two applicable areas for HD video.

2. International Anthropometric References – Much of the reference anthropometric data used to guide designs is based on the body dimensions European and North American populations, limiting applicability and, ultimately fit, to a broader user population. The availability of three-dimensional scanning technology, while still time-consuming and expensive, is driving the inclusion of additional populations. Size China is a program to create the first-ever digital database of Chinese head and face shapes for helmets, sunglasses and surgical masks. Such resources will provide a richer starting point for guiding form and size in product designs, but of course are not a replacement for fit testing with real participants.

3. Qualitative Data Management Software – As research capabilities mature, organizations will deal with a new set of challenges around handling larger volumes of research data. Research teams will struggle with organizing, presenting and efficiently re-using findings across projects. With that “embarrassment of riches, there is a need for techniques and tools that support research data management. For example, QSR Internationals’s forthcoming NVivo 8 provides a structure for entering, tagging and querying various forms of multimedia, qualitative data across multiple projects. These types of tools will enable more effective collaboration amongst both localized and geographically distributed researchers, and can provide a centralized repository for observational data.
4. Qualitative Data Analysis Software – The value of well-conducted research is extremely limited if it is not easily organized for effective communication. It is especially challenging to organize, analyze and interpret qualitative data such as user interview transcripts and observational field notes. Following many years of adapting general purpose software and technology, we now have access to a variety of software and hardware tools to support planning, collection, analysis and sharing of research data. Several new technologies can support unstructured data analysis in various ways including searching speech via text and syntactically mapping information. For example, IBM’s Many Eyes application visualizes text in a tree-like branching structure to enable more efficient analysis and data mining.

 

Methodologies

Design research methods will continue to adapt for studying the wider range of user experiences, beyond the primary product. Frameworks and techniques for mapping out user touch points will assist research planning, which will become specialized to particular domains (e.g. medical vs. consumer). Threading across all of this is the need for guidelines for effective research communication and presentation:

5. Comparative Ethnography - While many organizations are using ethnographic observation to understand end-user perspectives and stimulate innovative thinking, such research is frequently focused on a limited set of tasks and users. But a growing trend is to use ethnographic methodology to identify differences between contexts. For example, in a study of automobile driving behavior, Bresslergroup’s research plan not only focused on the in-car driving experience, but studied related, non-driving activities. Observing how comparable tasks (e.g. planning a route, choosing music to enjoy) are conducted in disparate contexts (in this case, in car vs. in home) provides unique insights to inform creative solutions.

6. Service Design - Beyond the “total product lifecycle” approach, organizations will need to understand where they fit within the range of loosely tied user experiences beyond the product itself. For example, medical implant designers should expand user research beyond surgery to understand the touch points that potential patients, caregivers and healthcare providers utilize to make treatment decisions, prepare for surgery, and deal with recovery and beyond. The emerging discipline of service design provides a framework for understanding how multiple types of providers and users interact across the various products, interfaces and environments where interactions and decisions occur.

7. Domain-Specific Research Methods – Although research practices can vary among domains (e.g. medical, consumer, industrial), core methods remain consistent. But as research teams mature, there is a movement towards industry-specific user research and design techniques. For example, in appliance design, usability testing with high-fidelity simulations is frequently necessary to elicit reliable performance feedback from consumers. By contrast, healthcare professionals are typically more capable of responding to lower-fidelity prototypes, partly attributable to their professional problem-solving processes.

8. Presenting Design Research – Typically, product development organizations can effectively present and communicate their work and capabilities in design and engineering. But even when products are backed by quality user research, teams may struggle with effectively communicating its influence on product design. Similarly, organizations have difficulty evaluating the research capabilities of potential employees. The Industrial Designers Society of Americas (IDSA) is leading the way in developing guidelines for design research presentations, starting with the organization of design research portfolio workshop & review at the Northeast District conference this April in Philadelphia.

User Research Technologies Odds and Ends

It's getting close to the end of the year, so here's some "house cleaning" - specifically a half-dozen bite-sized items related to user research and design technology that have come up in recent months:

• I recently covered some of the trends in touch screen technology.  Now, Smashing Magazine just published an article on outstanding recent developments in the field of user experience design.  Definitely worth checking out to see the state of the art.
• Popular Science has a brief piece of what to look for when buying a digital camcorder.  This includes a breakdown of key features by price range and an interactive schematic of camcorder technology.
• Eye-Fi is selling a wireless memory card that streamlines the uploading process from digital cameras to computers via local wireless networks.  Besides the benefits to consumers, this is a convenient method for uploading large quantities of images when returning from field research, especially if multiple cameras/cards were used.
• Technology Review has an article about MIT's keyword search engine for audio recordings.  The software converts audio speech into searchable text.  When this technology becomes more reliable and affordable, I expect to see it applied to qualitative data analysis (e.g. interviews and ethnographic recordings).
• Find out about the upcoming Measuring Behavior (2008) conference.  The event will be in the Netherlands next August and "focuses on methods, techniques and tools in behavioral research in the widest sense, from behavioral ecology to neuroscience and from physiology to ergonomics."
• The cover story from the most recent Design News discusses the science of sports, and the latest bio-mechanical and physiological measurement tools (like where does Jerry Rice actually make hand contact when he catches a football).

Technologies for Reading Minds and Expressions

News from the rapidly growing area of user research technology:

• MIT Technology Review reports that Omron, a Japanese electronics company, recently demonstrated software that can detect and measure smiles.  Applications may include smile detection sensors in digital cameras.  I see a clear connection to potential emotion measurement systems for user and market research.
• New Scientist reports on Microsoft's patent for  "Using electroencephalograph signals for task classification and activity recognition" aka mind reading.  Actually, the patent is for a method to filter EEG signal readings.  The solution can be applied during usability testing as a non-obtrusive method to measure user reactions.  There's a link to the patent itself for those interested in the legal and technical details.

HF Highlights from Connecting '07 - Size China

Given the 140(!) sessions that took place at the 2007 IDSA national conference this year in San Francisco, there's no shame in missing a few sessions.  Of course the topics that you really want to see all occur simultaneously, leaving one with a "paradox of choices".   

I was most impressed by Roger Ball's Size China:  A New World of Ergonomics.  Roger is a designer by training and professor at Hong Kong Polytechnic.  For the last 18 months, he has been building a database of anthropometric data by digitally scanning over 2,000 Chinese citizens.  The project was inspired by the lack of a comprehensive anthropometric database of Asian head and facial features, comparable to what is available for Caucasian populations.  For example, most helmets used in China were designed against Caucasian measurements and are ill-fitting due to significant differences in head shape between Asians and Caucasians(see image).

Roger said that his data will be made available for free to academic endeavors by contacting him directly.

Learn more about the project at: http://www.sizechina.com/html/index.html

I was intrigued by this project and interested in potential differences in perceived and reported fit among populations, not due to head size, but due to potential cultural and linguistic variances in what is considered comfortable and fitting. Perhaps some of the presenations on measuring emotion would have helped me address those issues, but like I said, I couldn't make all of the presentations.

Additional Reviews of Digital Audio and Video Recorders

Audio Recording

Due to interest generated by an earlier post on the advantages of using high quality audio recorders for field research I am posting this recently published comparative review of digital audio recorders from Wired magazine.  Note that I haven't used any of these reviewed recorders and moreover I don't think any of them record in stereo, which is a key advantage of the Samson H2 in my original post.

Video Recording

Along the same lines, I did an earlier post on the pros and cons of high definition video-recorders.  Well, here's a follow-up review of tape-less video-recorders from the New York Times.  It discusses the Sony/Panasonic used AVCHD format specifically designed for tape-less, high definition recording.

Addendum (Oct 12th) - I left out a link to one more useful review of high definition video-recorders from MIT's Technology Review.  The Sony HDR-CX7 HandyCam has great video quality, but lackluster editing software:

Review: Sony stuffs top-notch HD video into small camcorder, but included software falls short

iZone Sticker Photos for Field Research

A little bit of back to the future...although discontinued, Polaroid produced a line of cameras called iZone which were an updated version of the classic Polaroid instant camera. 

The cool feature of iZone was the film.  The photo sizes were very small ,about 2" x 1" - the goal was fun, not fidelity.  There were several different  types of novelty film: one film had fortunes printed to go along with the photo.  But my personal favorite is the sticker film, which has an adhesive back.  This made it very well suited for field observations.  You could take a quick photo, stick in in a note book,  jot down your observation notes and then go on to the next observation (click on photo inset above).  Even today with digital cameras there's no quick and easy way to combine photos and written notes in such a compact package.

Since the camera (and film) have been discontinued, they are a little hard to come by, but available through ebay and similar sources.  However, most of the film is near or past expiration - but I am told, and can testify from personal experience, that the film works well past its expiration date.

We'll be using iZones and sticker film to capture observations at the upcoming IDSA Connecting '07 conference.

The Value of High Quality Sound Recording in Research

A few weeks ago I discussed the use of iPods for field audio recordings.  While convenient, iPods are not know for the quality of recordings, especially with respect to the relatively inexpensive third-party microphones available for the iPod.

Audio recording can be more than just a means of documenting what was said in an interview.  It can provide high fidelity reproduction of an environment effective for communicating a situation or developing a solution. 

For those interested in higher quality recordings, there are a range of options and a corresponding range of costs.  A balanced solution is a product like the Samson Zoom H2.  At just under $200, this compact digital recording device enables high-quality stereo recording through the use of not two, but for microphones.  You can read more about the value of having four spatially displaced microphones on Samson's site, but in my opinion there are at least three potential benefits to recording in high quality stereo:

1. Better Resolution for Analysis:  Spatial separation of sound typically improves speech legibility in noisy environments (e.g. background noise, multiple speakers).  This not only helps you understand what someone is saying, but can you help differentiate among multiple speakers by their spatial position.
2. More Compelling Presentations: Rather than presenting feedback or quotes via text, an audience is more likely to be affected by hearing a direct recording of the speaker (e.g. the user, customer,etc).  Providing that sample in the context of the actual sound environment can present the issue more clearly. For example, a call-center operator who is trying to do his or her job while loud conversations are going on on either side of the operator's workstation.
3. More Realistic Recordings for Design Simulation:  It is often useful to have accurate sound recordings of an environment in order to successfully design for that situation.  For example, medical device alarms need to "compete" with ambient hospital background sounds including those of other, critical medical devices.  A high quality stereo recording can recreate that environment for design and testing purposes.

With the relative quality of sound becoming less important to most consumers who are used to MP3 and cell phone quality audio, the use of affordable, high quality recording and playback technology is a welcome return.

-Rob Tannen

Usability of Videogames

The cover story of the current issue of Wired magazine (15.09) discusses the user-centered approach to make an upcoming game playable.  Halo 3: How Microsoft Labs Invented a New Science of Play focuses on the work of Randy Pagulayan and his team at Microsoft, who conduct usability testing and analytics to optimize game play - for example, when an area of the game might be too difficult, or a key weapon overlooked by too many players. (Note - Randy is a grad school buddy of mine from University of Cincinnati - I've personally visited his lab and its quite impressive in terms of technology and methods).

I'm also trying out a new feature on the IDSA Human Factors site called Snap Shots, which displays a preview of a linked site on rollover.  Let me know if it's more useful than annoying or vice versa.

-Rob Tannen

iPods for Audio Field Recordings

Chalk up another use for iPods (if you haven't already), as recording devices for field interviews.  The portability, relatively large storage capacity and multi-purpose functionality of the iPod makes it a suitable tool for recording audio with the use of several available microphone attachments (both stereo and mono).

The New York Times recently reviewed some iPod microphones by Belkin, Griffin Technology and XtremeMac.  If anyone has used any of these, as well as associated editing software, please post your feedback as comments.

I'd love to see a video version for decent quality field video recordings.

High Definition Camcorder Reviews

Portable digitial video recorders are often the fundamental tool for the user researcher.  Documenting observations and activities in digital video provides a convenient and flexibile record for analysis and presentation.  Recently, a few high definition(HD) consumer (read: affordable) video cameras have become available.  Not to be confused with HDD (hard disk drive, for storage), high definition refers to the increased video resolution that can be useful for capturing a high-level of detail (e.g. recording manual tasks).

The New York Times recently reviewed three models from Panasonic, Sony and Samsung.  All had relative strengths and weaknesses in terms of image quality, ergonomics and storage - hopefully the next generation of these devices will improve upon some of these concerns. Note that the Panasonic model, which was the best rated, also comes in a version with an internal disc burner for much increased storage capabilities.

You can also get detailed high definition camcorder reviews at CNET:
|http://reviews.cnet.com/4323-6530_7-6548292.html?tag=txt

Eye Tracking For Product Design Research

As a follow-up to the research presentations at the IDSA Northeast District conference, I am posting a PDF version of the slide sets related to my presentation on Eye Tracking: 

Download tannen_eye_tracking_for_product_design.pdf (PDF presentation)

Download audio_panel.avi  (example video, AVI format)

Sample of  other  information sources about eye tracking:

Electronic Ink Eye Tracking Information (basic description and examples)

Rochester Institute of Technology - Visual Perception Lab (mobile eye tracker)

Research on Mobile Phone Design Preference

- Rob Tannen

Motion-Tracking for Design Research

Business Week's cover story discusses Motion-Tracking Technologies that are utilized for design, entertainment. safety and research.  Examples including monitoring blinking patterns to detect and manage driver drowsiness (see inset photo), and using hand-gestures to manipulate user interfaces.  The accompanying slide show provides illustrations of various other motion-tracking technologies and applications, include eye tracking and virtual surgery.

Morae 2 Launch

Techsmith is launching the latest version of its usability testing and video editing software, Morae.  Among other enhancements, the new version, Morae 2, will include built-in analysis and survey features - but the actual definition and scope of these is not clear at this point.

I've been using Morae for a couple of years and find it to be very effective for screen-based usability testing, but also as a quick way to record and edit interviews and observations.  I've even used it for vehicle-based usability testing of a handheld device.

Will post a review in the near future.

-Rob Tannen